Great Players: Alexander Petrov

Every so often, someone comes up with a really cool depiction of something, and this Youtube video illustrating the top chess players through history is well worth a look:

 So naturally one of the things I did was look at it to see how it meshed with my understanding of chess history. Most of the names that had made it to #1 were very familiar to me, with a few exceptions; I knew very little of Kolisch, von der Lasa, Alexandre and this article's subject, Alexander Petrov (1794-1867).

 So who was he? His Wikipedia article gives little detail, and nor does his collection of games on Chessbase - it's the same problem I had with Philidor, where very few of his games are preserved, and those that are were not against the other leading players of his day. (In Petrov's case, this was probably an issue of travelling distance - the main centres of chess activity were clearly in Western Europe - most of the other top players were British, French or German - and in those days, travel from Russia was probably rather more difficult than it is nowadays.)

Like Philidor, I could find no instances of him playing the opening that bears his name, although I did find some games where he played against it. Again, it seems like the same situation - the opening bears his name because he, in collaboration with Carl Jänisch, did a lot of the early work analysing it.

 Looking at what games we do have, it's clear that he was part of the Romantic school of the mid-19th century; very keen on rapid development and opening lines for attacks.

 




Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Great Players: Ignatz von Kolisch

Image
I first referenced this video in the piece about Alexander Petrov , but it bears another look: You will notice that  Paul Morphy was dominant throughout his entire competitive career, but his reign as world #1 was interrupted briefly by a player called Kolisch, who then almost immediately disappears from the scene. So this piqued my interest: who was this mysterious Kolisch, and why is his name so much less familiar than those of his contemporaries? Well, the answer, on looking at his  Wikipedia article , seems to be that he just had a very short playing career, and did not play much against the big names of his day. This is backed up by his chessgames page , which shows nearly all his games coming in the years 1857-1867. This did, however, include two triumphs in international tournaments. One was the relatively weak Cambridge 1860 event, but the other was the rather stronger  Paris 1867 event, which would also star future world champion Steinitz. This tournament effectively mark
Read more

West is Best at the 4NCL, Rounds 1-2, 22-23 October 2022

 The 4NCL , Britain's only professional chess league, has, like many chess events, been disrupted by the ongoing pandemic. The 2019-20 season was aborted six rounds in; there was no 2020-21 season, and the 2021-22 season was an experimental format for that season only: a Swiss system (chosen so that if it needed to terminate early, the final finishing positions would still be reasonable ones). The twelve teams who finished at the top of the Swiss that year would be in Division 1 in the new 2022-23 season, and my team, West Is Best, were one of the lucky twelve. This was naturally always going to be a tricky season to negotiate, and the way the draw was done meant we could expect a rocky start: the top six finishers of the previous season were paired to face the teams finishing 7th-12th in the first six rounds of the season, thus maximizing the chances of exciting promotion and relegation clashes occurring towards the end. Thus, arriving at the Daventry Court Hotel on the Saturday,
Read more

4NCL Congress, 9-11 July 2021

 So it turns out congress chess has started to make a return, in the shape of the long-running series of 4NCL Congresses . The 25th such event was held in Leamington Spa over the past weekend, and attracted a total entry of 130 entrants across 3 sections. Among the entrants were three grandmasters, Nigel Davies, Keith Arkell and Peter Wells, but none of those players actually won the Open section. First place was instead shared by two strong young players, FM Jonah Willow (19) and CM Aaravamudhan Balaji (16), with 4½/5. Balaji's performance was especially impressive, including a win against Wells and a draw against Arkell on his way to a rating gain of 67.2 points. Arkell finished third on 4 points. I've annotated three of the games; thank you to Jonathan Tait for giving help on how to display them.
Read more